I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Image:AnthonyBurgess 1985.jpg is being used on this article. Why write the plot if you won't write the ending? struggle 16:23, (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:AnthonyBurgess 1985.jpg It is not a slam against Muslims, but the actual ending of the novella half of 1985. Read the book and confirm that it is the ending of the novella. Masaruemoto 17:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC) The story's ending, not vandalism ĭo not rv my final sentence of the plot. 1985 (novel) is better than Nineteen Eighty-Five anyway. Why are we mis-"spelling" it? Garrick92 11:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC) I've moved it to 1985 (novel) I realise this isn't completely a novel, but as the article starts with 1985 is a novel by English writer Anthony Burgess and it's listed in Category:English novels, it probably should use the more conventional (novel) disambiguation rather than (book). Sorry to be so pedantic, I'm just pre-empting complaints regarding the page move! - James Kemp 13:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC) The title of the book is 1985 (numer not alpha). Shouldn't this page be moved to 1985 (book) or something similar? I realise that Nineteen Eighty-Four is published under both the numerical and alphabetical title, but as far as I know this book isn't.- James Kemp 20:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC) personally don't mind - "1985" does seem the usual name, I would only say I would prefer 1985 (novel). :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 10:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC) I considered using 1985 (novel), but only half of the text is a novel the first half is a critique of Nineteen Eighty-Four. Anyway, I wasn't sure what to do, if anything, about it. I followed this link from the 1984 page expecting to find the 1985 book by György Dalos. 4 Fair use rationale for Image:AnthonyBurgess 1985.jpg.
0 kommentar(er)
